Skip to main content

Growth of opposition to Tsarist rule


Emergence of opposition groups including the:

 

Constitutional Democrats (Cadets)

  • Liberal party that first stood for fairness and reform
  • As the revolution progressed, it lost its influence and its reputation failed
  • Those who wanted the Tsar back were too afraid to admit it, and thus, joined the Cadets.
  • As a result, the Cadets became a reactionary rather than liberal party, full of people who wanted to destroy its original cause from the inside.

 

Octobrists

  • Formed to implement the terms of the October Manifesto (oct, 1905)
  • Participated in Duma elections, and in the Third Duma (1907 - 1912) they won by far the greatest number of seats.
  • Initially supported Stolypin's methods, but slowly became disillusioned with his recationary policies
  • In September, 1915, after the outbreak of the first World War, they were critical of how the government was run
  • Eventually joined with the Constitutional Democrats to advocate their plans for reform.

 

Social Revolutionary Party

  • They thought violence was the necessary means by which Russia should be governed
  • Critical of the Tsarist regime and how the country was being run
  • Wanted land to be taken from the nobility and given to the peasants
  • Responsible for numerous assassinations of officials, including the Okhrana
  • Got widespread support from the peasantry in the countryside, but also some from the towns

and Social Democrats

  • December 1905: the party held their first meeting, in which they agreed upon 5 important points:
    1. Russia needed an armed uprising
    2. Russia should become a federal republic
    3. Terror could be used to advance their caused if required and if given permission by the highest authority in the party
    4. Private estates should become property of the state
  • They played little part in the 1905 revolution
  • They got 36 seats in the second duma (post 1906) but didn't take part in any other elections for the Duma.
  • When revolution broke out in March, 1917, the Army looked to them in the Nation's time of crisis. However, from there, their position only went down.
  • When the Provisional Government was still in place, they tried to form stronger ties with Lenin and the Bolsheviks. They failed
  • In 1919, their relationship with the Bolsheviks was so bitter that they even planned Lenin's overthrow. On paper, it seemed very unlikely, but in the face of the Civil War, it became a possibility.
  • They became unsuccessful because of their lack of support. Within the party itself, there were frequent disagreements as to how things would be run, which made them inefficient

Split in the Social Democrats - Mensheviks and Bolsheviks

  • The Mensheviks were the so-called minority (though this was rather untrue). They were more relaxed and wanted a government system loosely based around democracy. They were hesitant about using violence as a means of change, and, while they wanted to follow capitalism, they did not want an. One of their most notable members was Trotsky (at least, at first).

  • The Bolsheviks were the so-called majority (again, untrue) and wanted to use violence as a means of bringing about change. They wanted an organised and strictly run capitalist society, led by Lenin. He was inspired by much of Marx's writing and did not want any Tsarist police infiltrating his party. He wanted party members that could follow orders quickly and efficiently.


Summary!
  • The constitutional democrats (cadets) once stood for fairness and reform but fell into ill repute because their party was used as a desguise by reactionaries who wanted the Tsar back
  • The octobrists came into existence as a result of the October Manifesto and wanted reform as well. They were popular, and lasted a short while before joining with the Cadets.
  • The social revolutionaries were violent and wanted Russia to be a federal republic. They got influence at the start of the 1905 revolution, but soon fell, and the Bolsheviks refused to let them re-gain their old power.
  • The social democrats were also violent, for the most part, and wanted to take land from the rich to give to the peasantry. They killed a few government officials, too.

  • The Social Democrats split into the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks because of their opposing views. One wanted a loose democracy and the latter wanted a strictly run communist regime. Lenin led the Bolsheviks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Impact of WW1 on Russia

Russian defeats on the Eastern Front 1914 - 1916 Morale plummeted further with the deafeats at Tannenberg and Masurian lakes. By 1914, 1 million had been killed, wounded or taken prisoner. This number rose to 8 million in 1917. Soldiers were told to take weapons from the dead, which resulted in even more deaths because so many were ploughed down by Germany's armies, which were better equipped. Very poor leadership led to more defeats Soldiers lacked weapons and boots, so many were exposed to the effects of the cold and blamed this on careless, unfeeling officers. Economic, social and political effects of the war on Russia. Economic Shortages meant prices rose quickly Long bread queues and starvation Shortage in industrial materials meant that factories had to close This left many people unemployed Social Tsar at the war front (1915) meant that the losses were blamed on him per...

New Economic Policy (NEP)

Reasons for the NEP The Krondstadt Rebellion: they had been the Bolsheviks' most feverent supporters and Lenin had to send Trotsky to put down the rebellion. However, he was worried that if they rebelled, the rest of the country might too. Frequent strikes in cities People in bread lines getting quite angry Factional criticism within communist party Frequent peasant revolts Effects of the NEP There was a fixed tax on produce, so peasants could now sell or retain the surplus as they wished. This meant they now had more motivation to produce, and agricultural production increased. Agricultural town markets were allowed to re-open, so people got more money and higher wages Some peasants became quite rich as a result of the new policy, so the class of Kulaks re-emerged. They had previously been demonized in Bolshevik propaganda, and this led to some opposition within the party. Some became ri...

Problems facing Nicholas II

Weaknesses of Nicholas II as Tsar. Nicholas II was a great family man, but not that great of a ruler. He lacked the drive and imagination of his predecessors. Dismissed able ministers Encouraged unhealthy rivlary within his own cabinet Insisted on seeing ministers exclusively one-on-one (lack of communication) Wasn't comfortable outside military situations Appointed family members and friends as ministers (corrupt) Easily influenced, esp. by Rasputin Avoided important decisions Preferred a quiet, family life. Even he admitted he knew "nothing of the business of ruling" Thought he had a god-given right to be an autocrat, and refused any requests for reform. Blind to the negative effects of his policies Witte and industrial growth. Wanted to give new strength to autocracy through reform Encouraged foreign investment in industry to bring in capital Wanted ind...